Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Supreme Court rules opposed to Boston inside Christian banner case

Supreme Court rules opposed to Boston inside Christian banner case

WASHINGTON (AP) — A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that Boston violated the without charge speech rights of a conservative activist when it refused his appeal to travel through the air a Christian banner on a flagpole external outside City Hall.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote for the court of rules and regulations that the city discriminated opposed to the activist, Harold Shurtleff, since of his "religious viewpoint," flat though it had routinely approved applications for the use of one of the trio flagpoles external outside City Hall that travel through the air the U.S., Massachusetts with every one other accompanied by Boston flags.

Occasionally, the city takes down its own pennant with every one other accompanied by temporarily hoists another flag.

Shurtleff with every one other accompanied by his Camp Constitution wanted to travel through the air a white banner accompanied by a scarlet cross on a blue background inside the upper left-hand corner, called the Christian flag, to mark Constitution Day, Sept. 17, inside 2017.

The city had approved 284 consecutive applications to travel through the air flags, normally those of other nations, earlier to it rejected Shurtleff's since it was a Christian flag. The city said he could travel through the air a different banner, nevertheless Shurtleff refused, with every one other accompanied by foot courts upheld the city's decision.

But the high court of rules and regulations said the foot courts with every one other accompanied by the city were wrong. The instance hinged on whether the flag-flying is an take deed of the government, inside which instance Boston tin do whatever it wants, or private parties exist fond of Shurtleff, Breyer wrote.

Stephen Breyer

Supreme Court rules opposed to Boston inside Christian banner case

Justices boundary discrimination claims for emotional distress

Supreme Court Notebook: Roberts pays tribute to Breyer

AP-NORC poll: Many support Jackson court of rules and regulations confirmation

"Finally, we look at the area to which Boston actively controlled these banner raisings with every one other accompanied by shaped the messages the flags sent. The answer, it seems, is not at all. And that is the most salient characteristic of this case," Breyer wrote inside an opinion that too riffed on the brutalist architectural way of Boston's City Hall with every one other accompanied by the Siena, Italy-inspired 7-acre plaza on which it sits.

Breyer wrote that "the city's lack of meaningful involvement inside the selection of flags or the crafting of their messages leads us to classify the banner raisings while private, not government, speech—though nothing prevents Boston from changing its policies going forward."

The city has said that inside the event of a mislaying at the Supreme Court it inside all likelihood will alter its policy to lay clasp of additional jurisdiction of what flags tin fly.

Shurtleff is a former organizer accompanied by the John Birch Society with every one other accompanied by has used his Camp Constitution website to question the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, the consequence of the 2020 election that place President Joe Biden inside office, the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines with every one other accompanied by flat who was behind the Sept. 11 attacks.

None of that was at matter at the high court.

The instance is Shurtleff v. Boston, 20-1800.

Supreme Court rules opposed to Boston inside Christian banner case

HEMN.me
HEMN.me All About Trends

Post a Comment for "Supreme Court rules opposed to Boston inside Christian banner case"